Notice: تابع WP_Block_Type_Registry::register به طورنادرست فراخوانی شد. نام‌های نوع بلوک نباید حروف بزرگ داشته باشند. لطفاً برای اطلاعات بیشتر، اشکال زدایی در وردپرس را مشاهده کنید. (این پیام در نگارش 5.0.0 افزوده شده است.) in /home/ethicsho/public_html/wp-includes/functions.php on line 5313

Warning: Use of undefined constant TDC_PATH_LEGACY - assumed 'TDC_PATH_LEGACY' (this will throw an Error in a future version of PHP) in /home/ethicsho/public_html/wp-content/plugins/td-composer/td-composer.php on line 109

Warning: Use of undefined constant TDSP_THEME_PATH - assumed 'TDSP_THEME_PATH' (this will throw an Error in a future version of PHP) in /home/ethicsho/public_html/wp-content/plugins/td-composer/td-composer.php on line 113
بایگانی‌های B2430.R553 .M4613 2004 - خانه اخلاق پژوهان جوان
Notice: Trying to access array offset on value of type bool in /home/ethicsho/public_html/wp-content/plugins/wp-ulike/inc/general-functions.php on line 807
#
#

Democratic Authority: A Philosophical Framework

by David M. Estlund

0 Comments

Subject: Philosophy,

Democracy is not naturally plausible. Why turn such important matters over to masses of people who have no expertise? Many theories of democracy answer by appealing to the intrinsic value of democratic procedure, leaving aside whether it makes good decisions. In Democratic Authority, David Estlund offers a groundbreaking alternative based on the idea that democratic authority and legitimacy must depend partly on democracy’s tendency to make good decisions. Just as with verdicts in jury trials, Estlund argues, the authority and legitimacy of a political decision does not depend on the particular decision being good or correct. But the “epistemic value” of the procedure–the degree to which it can generally be accepted as tending toward a good decision–is nevertheless crucial. Yet if good decisions were all that mattered, one might wonder why those who know best shouldn’t simply rule. Estlund’s theory–which he calls “epistemic proceduralism”–avoids epistocracy, or the rule of those who know. He argues that while some few people probably do know best, this can be used in political justification only if their expertise is acceptable from all reasonable points of view. If we seek the best epistemic arrangement in this respect, it will be recognizably democratic–with laws and policies actually authorized by the people subject to them.

#
#

Scope of Morality

by Peter A. French

0 Comments

Subject: Ethics, Morale, Philosophy / Ethics & Moral Philosophy, Philosophy / General,

Thank you for using the free trial edition of Book Collector. We hope you enjoyed using it!
However, your trial has now expired.

Do you want to continue using Book Collector?
Then please buy a Book Collector license here.

#
#

Hegel’s Philosophy of Right

by James David

0 Comments

Subject: Law - Philosophy, Natural Law,

Thank you for using the free trial edition of Book Collector. We hope you enjoyed using it!
However, your trial has now expired.

Do you want to continue using Book Collector?
Then please buy a Book Collector license here.

#
#

FROM MORALITY TO VIRTUE

by Michael Slote

0 Comments

Subject: Common Sense, Electronic Books, Ethics, Utilitarianism,

In this book, Slote offers the first full-scale foundational account of virtue ethics to have appeared since the recent revival of interest in the ethics of virtue. Slote advocates a particular form of such ethics for its intuitive and structural advantages over Kantianism, utilitarianism, and common-sense morality, and he argues that the problems of other views can be avoided and a contemporary plausible version of virtue ethics achieved only by abandoning specifically moral concepts for general aretaic notions like admirability and virtue. Although this study is not bound by particular Aristotelian doctrines, it places an Aristotelian emphasis on both self-benefiting and other-benefiting virtues. Slote criticizes Kantian and common-sense morality for internal incoherencies and for downgrading the moral individual and her well-being in some previously unnoticed ways. By contrast, this book defends a distinctive, intuitive, and symmetric ethical principle according to which we should balance self-concern with concern for others, but it also concludes that there is, contrary to utilitarianism, no single basis for status as a virtue nor any simple relation between the virtues and human well-being.

محبوب ترین موضوعات

نتایج برای : B2430.R553 .M4613 2004
نمایش 1 از 1 کتاب

آخرین نقد و بررسی‌ کتاب‌ها

محدودیت‌های لیبرالیسم، افق‌های جامعیت‌گرایی

محدودیت‌های لیبرالیسم، افق‌های جامعیت‌گرایی

ما از اخلاق چه انتظاری داریم؟ این سوال شاید تاحدودی برای عموم مردم و یا متخصصان این رشته قابل پاسخ باشد؛ اینکه خوب بودن را به ما بیاموزد و در تنظیم روابط فردی م...

میثم غلامی
میثم غلامی 25 نوامبر 2019۹۹
به مطالعات اخلاقی علاقمند هستید؟

به مطالعات اخلاقی علاقمند هستید؟

جشن کتاب تهران به ایستگاه سی و یکم رسیده است. حال و احوال نشر کتاب خوب نیست و باید فرهنگ‌دوستان را به خرید و هدیه دادن کتاب ترغیب نمود. خانه اخلاق‌پژوهان جوان ب...

فاطمه شریفیان
فاطمه شریفیان 07 می 2018۹۹
پایش و پالایش جان، مرور انتقادی کتاب تزکیه النفس

پایش و پالایش جان، مرور انتقادی کتاب تزکیه النفس

بنیاد کتاب‌های اخلاق اسلامی عمدتا پالایش جان از آلودگی‌ها و آراستن آن به زیبایی‌ها است. اندیشه محوری این قبیل کتاب‌ها آن است که انسان فعلی آنی نیست که باید باشد...

فاطمه شریفیان
فاطمه شریفیان 13 دسامبر 2016۹۹

محبوب‌ترین کتاب‌ها

#

Encyclopedia of Animal Rights and Animal Welfare
#

Environment and Philosophy
#

Faces of Intention
#

۱۰۱ Philosophy Problems
Wishlist 0
Open wishlist page Continue shopping