Notice: تابع WP_Block_Type_Registry::register به طورنادرست فراخوانی شد. نام‌های نوع بلوک نباید حروف بزرگ داشته باشند. لطفاً برای اطلاعات بیشتر، اشکال زدایی در وردپرس را مشاهده کنید. (این پیام در نگارش 5.0.0 افزوده شده است.) in /home/ethicsho/public_html/wp-includes/functions.php on line 5313

Warning: Use of undefined constant TDC_PATH_LEGACY - assumed 'TDC_PATH_LEGACY' (this will throw an Error in a future version of PHP) in /home/ethicsho/public_html/wp-content/plugins/td-composer/td-composer.php on line 109

Warning: Use of undefined constant TDSP_THEME_PATH - assumed 'TDSP_THEME_PATH' (this will throw an Error in a future version of PHP) in /home/ethicsho/public_html/wp-content/plugins/td-composer/td-composer.php on line 113
بایگانی‌های 9780415116671 - خانه اخلاق پژوهان جوان
Notice: Trying to access array offset on value of type bool in /home/ethicsho/public_html/wp-content/plugins/wp-ulike/inc/general-functions.php on line 807
#
#

Some Main Problems of Philosophy

by G.E. Moore

0 Comments

Subject: Philosophy,

Thank you for using the free trial edition of Book Collector. We hope you enjoyed using it!
However, your trial has now expired.

Do you want to continue using Book Collector?
Then please buy a Book Collector license here.

#
#

A SYSTEM OF ETHICS

by Friedrich Paulsen

0 Comments

Subject: Philosophy,

Thank you for using the free trial edition of Book Collector. We hope you enjoyed using it!
However, your trial has now expired.

Do you want to continue using Book Collector?
Then please buy a Book Collector license here.

#
#

Atrocity Paradigm

by Claudia Card

0 Comments

Subject: Good And Evil,

What distinguishes evils from ordinary wrongs? Is hatred a necessarily evil? Are some evils unforgivable? Are there evils we should tolerate? What can make evils hard to recognize? Are evils inevitable? How can we best respond to and live with evils? Claudia Card offers a secular theory of evil that responds to these questions and more. Evils, according to her theory, have two fundamental components. One component is reasonably foreseeable intolerable harm — harm that makes a life indecent and impossible or that makes a death indecent. Theother component is culpable wrongdoing. Atrocities, such as genocides, slavery, war rape, torture, and severe child abuse, are Card’s paradigms because in them these key elements are writ large. Atrocities deserve more attention than secular philosophers have so far paid them. They are distinguishedfrom ordinary wrongs not by the psychological states of evildoers but by the seriousness of the harm that is done. Evildoers need not be sadistic: they may simply be negligent or unscrupulous in pursuing their goals. Card’s theory represents a compromise between classic utilitarian and stoic alternatives (including Kant’s theory of radical evil). Utilitarians tend to reduce evils to their harms; Stoics tend to reduce evils to the wickedness of perpetrators: Card accepts neither reduction. She also responds toNietzsche’s challenges about the worth of the concept of evil, and she uses her theory to argue that evils are more important than merely unjust inequalities. She applies the theory in explorations of war rape and violence against intimates. She also takes up what Primo Levi called “the gray zone”,where victims become complicit in perpetrating on others evils that threaten to engulf themselves. While most past accounts of evil have focused on perpetrators, Card begins instead from the position of the victims, but then considers more generally how to respond to — and live with — evils, asvictims, as perpetrators, and as those who have become both.

#
#

Loyalty: An Essay On The Morality Of Relationships

by George P. Fletcher

0 Comments

Subject: Ethics & Moral Philosophy, Philosophical Positions & Movements, Social Sciences - General & Miscellaneous,

At a time when age-old political structures are crumbling, civil strife abounds, and economic uncertainty permeates the air, loyalty offers us security in our relationships with associates, friends, and family. Yet loyalty is a suspect virtue. It is not impartial. It is not blind. Itviolates the principles of morality that have dominated Western thought for the last two hundred years.Loyalties are also thought to be irrational and contrary to the spirit of Capitalism. In a free market society, we are encouraged to move to the competition when we are not happy. This way of thinking has invaded our personal relationships and undermined our capacities for friendship and loyaltyto those who do not serve our immediate interests. As George P. Fletcher writes, it is time for loyal bonds, born of history and experience, to prevail both over impartial morality and the self-interested thinking of the market trader.In this extended essay, George P. Fletcher offers an account of loyalty that illuminates its role in our relationships with family and friends, our ties to country, and the commitment of the religious to God and their community. Fletcher opposes the traditional view of the moral self as detachedfrom context and history. He argues instead that loyalty, not impartial detachment, should be the central feature of our moral and political lives. Writing as a political “liberal,” he claims that a commitment to country is necessary to improve the lot of the poor and disadvantaged. This commitmentto country may well require greater reliance on patriotic rituals in education and a reconsideration of the Supreme Court’s extending the First Amendment to protect flag burning. Given the worldwide currents of parochialism and political decentralization, the task for us, Fletcher argues, is torenew our commitment to a single nation united in its diversity.Bringing to bear his expertise as a law professor, Fletcher reasons that the legal systems should defer to existing relationships of loyalty. Familial, professional, and religious loyalties should be respected as relationships beyond the limits of the law. Thus surrogate mothers should not beforced to surrender and betray their children, spouses should not be required to testify against each other in court, parents should not be prevented from willing their property to their children, and the religiously committed should not be forced to act contrary to conscience.Yet the question remains: Aren’t loyalty, and particularly patriotism, dangerously one-sided? Indeed, they are, but no more than are love and friendship. The challenge, Fletcher maintains, is to overcome the distorting effects of impartial morality and to develop a morality of loyalty properlysuited to our emotional and spiritual lives. Justice has its sphere, as do loyalties. In this book, Fletcher provides the first step toward a new way of thinking that recognizes the complexity of our moral and political lives.

محبوب ترین موضوعات

نتایج برای : 9780415116671
نمایش 1 از 1 کتاب

آخرین نقد و بررسی‌ کتاب‌ها

محدودیت‌های لیبرالیسم، افق‌های جامعیت‌گرایی

محدودیت‌های لیبرالیسم، افق‌های جامعیت‌گرایی

ما از اخلاق چه انتظاری داریم؟ این سوال شاید تاحدودی برای عموم مردم و یا متخصصان این رشته قابل پاسخ باشد؛ اینکه خوب بودن را به ما بیاموزد و در تنظیم روابط فردی م...

میثم غلامی
میثم غلامی 25 نوامبر 2019۹۹
به مطالعات اخلاقی علاقمند هستید؟

به مطالعات اخلاقی علاقمند هستید؟

جشن کتاب تهران به ایستگاه سی و یکم رسیده است. حال و احوال نشر کتاب خوب نیست و باید فرهنگ‌دوستان را به خرید و هدیه دادن کتاب ترغیب نمود. خانه اخلاق‌پژوهان جوان ب...

فاطمه شریفیان
فاطمه شریفیان 07 می 2018۹۹
پایش و پالایش جان، مرور انتقادی کتاب تزکیه النفس

پایش و پالایش جان، مرور انتقادی کتاب تزکیه النفس

بنیاد کتاب‌های اخلاق اسلامی عمدتا پالایش جان از آلودگی‌ها و آراستن آن به زیبایی‌ها است. اندیشه محوری این قبیل کتاب‌ها آن است که انسان فعلی آنی نیست که باید باشد...

فاطمه شریفیان
فاطمه شریفیان 13 دسامبر 2016۹۹

محبوب‌ترین کتاب‌ها

#

Encyclopedia of Animal Rights and Animal Welfare
#

Environment and Philosophy
#

Faces of Intention
#

۱۰۱ Philosophy Problems
Wishlist 0
Open wishlist page Continue shopping