Notice: تابع WP_Block_Type_Registry::register به طورنادرست فراخوانی شد. نام‌های نوع بلوک نباید حروف بزرگ داشته باشند. لطفاً برای اطلاعات بیشتر، اشکال زدایی در وردپرس را مشاهده کنید. (این پیام در نگارش 5.0.0 افزوده شده است.) in /home/ethicsho/public_html/wp-includes/functions.php on line 5313

Warning: Use of undefined constant TDC_PATH_LEGACY - assumed 'TDC_PATH_LEGACY' (this will throw an Error in a future version of PHP) in /home/ethicsho/public_html/wp-content/plugins/td-composer/td-composer.php on line 109

Warning: Use of undefined constant TDSP_THEME_PATH - assumed 'TDSP_THEME_PATH' (this will throw an Error in a future version of PHP) in /home/ethicsho/public_html/wp-content/plugins/td-composer/td-composer.php on line 113
بایگانی‌های Kant, Immanuel - Criticism And Interpretation - خانه اخلاق پژوهان جوان
Notice: Trying to access array offset on value of type bool in /home/ethicsho/public_html/wp-content/plugins/wp-ulike/inc/general-functions.php on line 807
#
#

Belief’s Own Ethics

by Jonathan Adler

0 Comments

Subject: Medical / Neurology, Philosophy / Epistemology, Psychology / Cognitive Psychology, Psychology / General,

The fundamental question of the ethics of belief is “What ought one to believe?” According to the traditional view of evidentialism, the strength of one’s beliefs should be proportionate to the evidence. Conventional ways of defending and challenging evidentialism rely on the idea that what one ought to believe is a matter of what it is rational, prudent, ethical, or personally fulfilling to believe. Common to all these approaches is that they look outside of belief itself to determine what one ought to believe. In this book Jonathan Adler offers a strengthened version of evidentialism, arguing that the ethics of belief should be rooted in the concept of belief—that evidentialism is belief’s own ethics. A key observation is that it is not merely that one ought not, but that one cannot, believe, for example, that the number of stars is even. The “cannot” represents a conceptual barrier, not just an inability. Therefore belief in defiance of one’s evidence (or evidentialism) is impossible. Adler addresses such questions as irrational beliefs, reasonableness, control over beliefs, and whether justifying beliefs requires a foundation. Although he treats the ethics of belief as a central topic in epistemology, his ideas also bear on rationality, argument and pragmatics, philosophy of religion, ethics, and social cognitive psychology.

#
#

A STUDY IN ETHICAL THEORY

by Donald MacKenzie MacKinnon

0 Comments

Subject: Ethics,

Thank you for using the free trial edition of Book Collector. We hope you enjoyed using it!
However, your trial has now expired.

Do you want to continue using Book Collector?
Then please buy a Book Collector license here.

#
#

TIME FOR ARISTOTLE

by Ursula Coope

0 Comments

Subject: Philosophy Of Nature, Time - Philosophy,

What is the relation between time and change? Does time depend on the mind? Is the present always the same or is it always different? Aristotle tackles these questions in the Physics, and Time for Aristotle is the first book in English devoted to this discussion. Aristotle claims that time is not a kind of change, but that it is something dependent on change; he defines it as a kind of “number of change.” Ursula Coope argues that what this means is that time is a kind of order (not, as is commonly supposed, a kind of measure). It is universal order within which all changes are related to each other. This interpretation enables Coope to explain two puzzling claims that Aristotle makes: that the now is like a moving thing, and that time depends for its existence on the mind. Brilliantly lucid in its explanation of this challenging section of the Physics, Time for Aristotle shows his discussion to be of enduring philosophical interest.

#
#

Moral Reality

by Paul Bloomfield

0 Comments

Subject: ,

Book Summary of Moral RealityWe typically assume that the standard for what is beautiful lies in the eye of the beholder. Yet this is not the case when we consider morality; what we deem morally good is not usually a matter of opinion. Such thoughts push us toward being realists about moral properties, but a cogent theory of moral realism has long been an elusive philosophical goal. Paul Bloomfield here offers a rigorous defense of moral realism, developing an ontology for morality that models the property of being morally good on the property of being physically healthy. The model is assembled systematically; it first presents the metaphysics of healthiness and goodness, then explains our epistemic access to properties such as these, adds a complementary analysis of the semantics and syntax of moral discourse, and finishes with a discussion of how we become motivated to act morally. Bloomfield closely attends to the traditional challenges facing moral realism, and the discussion nimbly ranges from modern medical theory to ancient theories of virtue, and from animal navigation to the nature of normativity. Maintaining a highly readable style throughout, Moral Reality yields one of the most compelling theories of moral realism to date and will appeal to philosophers working on issues in metaphysics or moral philosophy.

#
#

Morality Of Pluralism

by John Kekes

0 Comments

Subject: Ethics, Pluralism, Values,

Current controversies about abortion, the environment, pornography, AIDS, capital punishment, and similar issues naturally lead to the question of whether there are any values that can be ultimately justified, or whether values are simply conventional. John Kekes argues that the present moral and political uncertainties are due to a deep change in our society from a dogmatic to a pluralistic view of values. Dogmatism is committed to there being only one justifiable system of values. Pluralism recognizes many such systems, and yet it avoids a chaotic relativism according to which all values are in the end arbitrary. Maintaining that good lives must be reasonable, but denying that they must conform to one true pattern, Kekes develops and justifies a pluralistic account of good lives and values, and works out its political, moral, and personal implications. The author defines values as possibilities whose realization would make lives good. He recognizes that their realization is difficult, especially since it involves choices among many, often conflicting, values. He argues, however, that living a good life requires a resolution of these conflicts, although reasonable resolutions are themselves plural in nature. His central claim is that pluralism is both reasonable and a preferable alternative to dogmatism and relativism.

محبوب ترین موضوعات

نتایج برای : Kant, Immanuel - Criticism And Interpretation
نمایش 1 از 1 کتاب

آخرین نقد و بررسی‌ کتاب‌ها

محدودیت‌های لیبرالیسم، افق‌های جامعیت‌گرایی

محدودیت‌های لیبرالیسم، افق‌های جامعیت‌گرایی

ما از اخلاق چه انتظاری داریم؟ این سوال شاید تاحدودی برای عموم مردم و یا متخصصان این رشته قابل پاسخ باشد؛ اینکه خوب بودن را به ما بیاموزد و در تنظیم روابط فردی م...

میثم غلامی
میثم غلامی 25 نوامبر 2019۹۹
به مطالعات اخلاقی علاقمند هستید؟

به مطالعات اخلاقی علاقمند هستید؟

جشن کتاب تهران به ایستگاه سی و یکم رسیده است. حال و احوال نشر کتاب خوب نیست و باید فرهنگ‌دوستان را به خرید و هدیه دادن کتاب ترغیب نمود. خانه اخلاق‌پژوهان جوان ب...

فاطمه شریفیان
فاطمه شریفیان 07 می 2018۹۹
پایش و پالایش جان، مرور انتقادی کتاب تزکیه النفس

پایش و پالایش جان، مرور انتقادی کتاب تزکیه النفس

بنیاد کتاب‌های اخلاق اسلامی عمدتا پالایش جان از آلودگی‌ها و آراستن آن به زیبایی‌ها است. اندیشه محوری این قبیل کتاب‌ها آن است که انسان فعلی آنی نیست که باید باشد...

فاطمه شریفیان
فاطمه شریفیان 13 دسامبر 2016۹۹

محبوب‌ترین کتاب‌ها

#

Encyclopedia of Animal Rights and Animal Welfare
#

Environment and Philosophy
#

Faces of Intention
#

۱۰۱ Philosophy Problems
Wishlist 0
Open wishlist page Continue shopping